Unit 5 — Media and Truth
Track G+M · Klasse 10 · Niveau G/M
Learning objectives Link to heading
- I can read a short text and identify three signs of misinformation.
- I can use cautious-claim language (it appears that, evidence suggests, critics argue that).
- I can write a 180-word media-literacy review.
curriculum framework (“Bildungsplan”) alignment Link to heading
- 3.3.1 Soziokulturelles Orientierungswissen / Themen
- 3.3.3.2 Leseverstehen
- 3.3.3.5 Schreiben
- 3.3.3.7 Verfügen über sprachliche Mittel – Wortschatz
- 3.3.4 Text- und Medienkompetenz
(Source: https://www.bildungsplaene-bw.de/,Lde/LS/BP2016BW/ALLG/SEK1/E1)
Lead-in story Link to heading
Sam’s class made a Five-Minute Fact-Check board on the wall. Each Friday, every student pinned one viral claim to the board, with three columns: source / evidence / what would change my mind. By March, the wall was full. Mr. Yilmaz did not say I told you so. He just looked at the wall sideways and smiled.
1. Activate Link to heading
Headline scan. Three real-looking headlines on the slide. Mark each: check / probably true / probably wrong.
2. Input Link to heading
Reading — Five-Minute Fact-Check Link to heading
Most viral claims feel true because they fit a pattern we already believe. The fact-checker’s job is small but stubborn: ask three questions. Where is this from? What is the actual evidence? What would change my mind? If a claim cannot survive these questions, it does not belong in your shareable list.
Vocabulary — media literacy Link to heading
verify, source, primary source, secondary source, fact-check, peer-reviewed, citation, anecdote, correlation vs. causation, statistical sample, bias, framing, context, viral, debunked, retracted.
Cautious-claim language Link to heading
It appears that … / Evidence suggests that … / According to (named source) … / Critics argue that … / This is contested / Studies indicate that … / There is some evidence that …
3. Practise Link to heading
Niveau G Link to heading
- Match: peer-reviewed → expert-checked; primary source → original; debunked → shown false.
- Choose cautious phrase: (my own claim) → ___ ; (another expert’s claim) → ___ .
Niveau M Link to heading
- Build 4 cautious-claim sentences from a real or imagined news topic.
4. Produce Link to heading
Media-literacy review, 180 words. Pick a viral claim. Apply the three-question check. Use 4 cautious-claim phrases.
Sample Link to heading
A widely-shared post claims that one cup of green tea per day reduces the risk of dementia by 40 %. The post links to a science-sounding website. According to the linked website, the claim is based on a 2019 study. It appears, however, that the study sampled only 70 participants over six months — too small to support a 40 % claim. There is some evidence that green-tea polyphenols affect inflammation, but this is contested. Critics argue that the study has not been replicated. What would change my mind: a larger, peer-reviewed study with at least 1,000 participants over five years, ideally a meta-analysis. The original post itself shows two warning signs: the round number (40 %) and the absence of a named researcher. I would share it only after a serious follow-up.
5. Reflect Link to heading
- I can identify 3 signs of misinformation.
- I can use cautious-claim language.
- I can write a 180-word media-literacy review.
One thing in your notebook: Write one sentence using something you learned in this Unit.
Exam example Link to heading
Task 1 — Listening (10 BE) Link to heading
Listen twice.
“The post claims that one cup of green tea per day reduces dementia risk by 40 %. The study sampled only 70 participants over six months. Critics argue the study has not been replicated. The post itself uses a round number and no named researcher.”
- Claim: ___ . 2. Sample: ___ . 3. Critics’ point: ___ . 4. Two warning signs: ___ .
Task 2 — Reading (12 BE) Link to heading
Read the Five-Minute Fact-Check extract above.
- Three questions: ___ . 2. What viral claims exploit: ___ . 3. Fact-checker job: ___ . 4. Conclusion: ___ .
Task 3 — Use of English (10 BE) Link to heading
Insert cautious-claim language.
- ___ that 86 % of Australians live in cities.
- ___ that hybrid work reduces stress.
- ___ , the study has not been replicated.
- ___ argue that the data is incomplete.
Task 4 — Writing (13 BE) Link to heading
Write 180 words: a media-literacy review of a viral claim. Use 4 cautious-claim phrases.
Downloads Link to heading
Differentiation. Niveau G: scaffold card with the key structure. Above Niveau M: extension prompt linking to Klasse 11 (or post-Klasse-10 path).
Common pitfalls Link to heading
- Studies say (vague) — better: A 2019 study by … indicates that ….
- Most people think without source — anecdote, not evidence.
- Round numbers (40 %, 90 %) → red flag for approximated or invented data.
Further reading / listening Link to heading
- BBC Reality Check.
- FullFact.org (UK).
- Snopes.com — wide range of fact-checks.

